• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

AIDSVu

AIDSVu

AIDSVu is an interactive online map depicting the HIV epidemic in the U.S.

  • INTERACTIVE MAP
  • LOCATION PROFILES
  • Find Services
  • News & Updates
  • Tools & Resources
  • Awareness Days
Home Tools & Resources deeper-look Deeper Look: Ending the HIV Epidemic

Deeper Look: Ending the HIV Epidemic

A Bold Vision for America’s Future

The Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States (EHE) initiative represents one of the most ambitious public health undertakings in recent American history. Launched in 2019, this federal initiative sets forth an audacious goal: to reduce new HIV infections in the United States by 75% by 2025 and by 90% by 2030. This vision is built on a foundation of scientific advances, proven prevention strategies, and the recognition that we now possess the tools and knowledge necessary to fundamentally alter the trajectory of the HIV epidemic.

The initiative emerged from a growing understanding that the United States had reached a pivotal moment in the fight against HIV. Despite decades of progress in treatment and prevention, new HIV infections had plateaued at approximately 37,000-38,000 annually. While this represented a significant reduction from the peak years of the epidemic, it also indicated that traditional approaches, while necessary, were insufficient to achieve the dramatic reductions needed to end the epidemic. The EHE initiative was conceived as a comprehensive response that would leverage existing tools more strategically while addressing the structural and social determinants that perpetuate HIV transmission.

The timing of the initiative reflected both scientific opportunity and political will. Advances in HIV treatment had established that people with HIV who achieve and maintain undetectable viral loads cannot transmit the virus sexually (U=U: Undetectable equals Untransmittable). Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) had proven more than 99% effective at preventing HIV acquisition when taken consistently. Rapid HIV testing technologies enabled same-day diagnosis and immediate linkage to care. These biomedical advances, combined with improved understanding of the social determinants of HIV vulnerability, created unprecedented opportunities for epidemic impact.

The Four Pillars: A Strategic Framework

The EHE initiative is built around four strategic pillars that together form a comprehensive approach to HIV prevention and care. These pillars reflect lessons learned from decades of HIV work and emphasize the importance of coordinated, multi-faceted responses that address both immediate health needs and underlying structural factors.

Diagnose represents the foundation of the entire strategy, recognizing that identifying people with undiagnosed HIV infection is essential for both individual health outcomes and community prevention. The initiative emphasizes expanding HIV testing in healthcare settings, community-based programs, and innovative venues that can reach populations who might not otherwise be tested. This includes routine screening in healthcare settings, targeted testing in high-prevalence areas, and expanded use of self-testing technologies that remove barriers to testing access.

Treat focuses on ensuring that people diagnosed with HIV are rapidly linked to care and supported in achieving and maintaining viral suppression. This pillar recognizes that effective treatment serves dual purposes: maintaining the health and wellbeing of people with HIV while eliminating their risk of transmitting the virus to others. The initiative emphasizes same-day treatment initiation when clinically appropriate, patient navigation services that help people overcome barriers to care, and comprehensive support services that address social determinants affecting treatment success.

Prevent encompasses a broad range of interventions designed to reduce HIV acquisition risk among people who do not have HIV. This includes expanding access to PrEP, particularly among populations at highest risk; implementing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) programs; supporting syringe services programs for people who inject drugs; and addressing structural factors such as housing instability and economic vulnerability that increase HIV risk.

Respond acknowledges that HIV transmission often occurs in clusters or outbreaks that require rapid, coordinated public health responses. This pillar emphasizes surveillance systems that can quickly identify unusual patterns of transmission, outbreak response protocols that can contain further spread, and community engagement strategies that build trust and cooperation with affected populations.

Geographic Focus: Targeting Resources Where They’re Needed Most

The EHE initiative represents a departure from traditional, broad-based public health approaches by focusing resources on the geographic areas and populations where HIV transmission is most concentrated. This strategy recognizes that the HIV epidemic in the United States is best understood as a collection of microepidemics, each with distinct characteristics and requiring tailored responses.

The initiative targets 57 priority jurisdictions that together account for more than half of all new HIV diagnoses in the United States. These include 48 counties with the highest burden of HIV infections, plus Washington D.C., and 7 states with substantial rural HIV epidemics (Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, and South Carolina). This geographic concentration allows for intensive, coordinated interventions that can achieve maximum epidemiological impact with available resources.

The geographic distribution of these priority jurisdictions reveals important patterns about HIV in America. Of the 48 highest-burden counties, 48% are located in the South, reflecting the ongoing concentration of the epidemic in Southern states. Additionally, in 63% of the 48 target counties and Washington D.C., the percentage of people living in poverty exceeds the national average, highlighting the intersection between economic disadvantage and HIV vulnerability.

The focus on priority jurisdictions has enabled the development of localized strategies that address specific community needs and circumstances. For example, interventions in rural Southern states might emphasize mobile testing and telemedicine to address geographic barriers to care, while programs in urban areas might focus on community-based organizations and peer navigation services. This tailored approach recognizes that effective HIV prevention and care must be responsive to local contexts, populations, and resources.

The Political and Funding Landscape: Navigating Complex Challenges

The EHE initiative has operated within a complex and sometimes challenging political environment that has significantly influenced its implementation and sustainability. While the initiative was launched with bipartisan support and has generally maintained congressional backing, funding levels have consistently fallen short of administration requests, creating ongoing challenges for full implementation of the strategy.

The funding trajectory tells a story of both commitment and constraint. From its inception in fiscal year 2019 (when some existing funds were reprogrammed to launch the initiative) through fiscal year 2024, total EHE funding has reached $2.33 billion. However, this represents a pattern where annual congressional appropriations have consistently been lower than presidential budget requests. For fiscal year 2025, the Biden Administration requested $593 million across CDC, HRSA, IHS, and NIH, representing a $20 million increase over fiscal year 2023 enacted levels, but the final appropriation remains subject to congressional action.

This funding gap has real-world implications for the initiative’s ability to achieve its ambitious goals. While the initiative has made significant progress in expanding testing, linkage to care, and prevention services, the consistent underfunding means that programs operate at less than optimal capacity. Local health departments and community organizations often must make difficult choices about which populations to serve and which interventions to prioritize, potentially leaving gaps in coverage that could undermine epidemic impact.

The political dynamics surrounding EHE funding reflect broader tensions in federal HIV policy, including debates about the appropriate federal role in public health, concerns about fiscal responsibility, and ongoing cultural and political divisions about issues related to sexuality and drug use. Some congressional members have raised questions about the initiative’s cost-effectiveness, while others have argued for even greater investment given the potential for long-term savings from preventing new infections.

Implementation Challenges and Successes

The implementation of the EHE initiative has revealed both the potential and the limitations of large-scale public health interventions. On the success side, the initiative has demonstrably expanded HIV prevention and care services in priority jurisdictions. CDC data indicate that EHE-funded programs have increased HIV testing, improved linkage to care rates, and expanded PrEP access in targeted areas. HRSA-funded health centers serving EHE priority areas have conducted 1.7 million HIV tests annually and serve nearly 9 million patients, of whom 79% are racial and ethnic minorities.

However, implementation has also faced significant challenges that highlight the complexity of ending an epidemic rooted in structural inequities. Workforce shortages represent a critical barrier, with an estimated 80% of counties in 14 Southern states having no experienced HIV clinicians. This shortage is particularly acute in rural areas, where geographic barriers compound workforce limitations. The proposed Bio-Preparedness Workforce Pilot Program, which would train and deploy HIV and infectious disease specialists to underserved areas, has faced political resistance and funding challenges despite broad support from medical and public health organizations.

Stigma and discrimination continue to pose formidable barriers to the initiative’s success, particularly for key populations most affected by HIV. Despite scientific advances and policy changes, many people continue to face rejection, judgment, and discrimination when seeking HIV-related services. This is particularly challenging for gay and bisexual men, transgender individuals, people who use drugs, and sex workers, who may avoid healthcare settings where they fear mistreatment.

The COVID-19 pandemic created additional implementation challenges by disrupting healthcare delivery, redirecting public health resources, and creating new barriers to accessing services. However, it also accelerated some innovations, including expanded use of telehealth, at-home testing, and flexible service delivery models that have been incorporated into ongoing EHE programming.

The Science Behind the Strategy

The EHE initiative is grounded in robust scientific evidence about effective HIV prevention and treatment interventions. The strategy leverages decades of research demonstrating that combination prevention approaches—using multiple, complementary interventions simultaneously—can achieve greater impact than any single intervention alone.

The “treatment as prevention” paradigm forms a cornerstone of the EHE strategy, based on definitive evidence that people with HIV who achieve and maintain undetectable viral loads cannot transmit the virus sexually. This scientific breakthrough transformed HIV treatment from a purely individual health intervention to a powerful prevention tool. The initiative emphasizes rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and comprehensive support services to help people achieve and maintain viral suppression.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) represents another scientific pillar of the initiative, with clinical trials demonstrating more than 99% effectiveness at preventing HIV acquisition when taken consistently. The initiative has focused on expanding PrEP access, particularly among populations at highest risk, while addressing barriers including cost, stigma, and provider knowledge. However, PrEP uptake has remained lower than optimal, particularly among women and communities of color, requiring ongoing attention to access and equity issues.

The initiative also draws on implementation science research that provides insights into how to effectively translate proven interventions into real-world settings. This includes research on community engagement strategies, cultural adaptation of interventions, integration of services across different providers and settings, and approaches to addressing structural barriers that affect intervention uptake and effectiveness.

Community Engagement and Health Equity

Central to the EHE initiative’s design is recognition that ending the HIV epidemic requires meaningful engagement with communities most affected by HIV, particularly communities that have historically faced marginalization and discrimination. The initiative explicitly emphasizes community engagement as both a strategy and a value, recognizing that sustainable change must be driven by and accountable to the people it aims to serve.

HRSA has developed a comprehensive community engagement framework with five guiding principles for EHE work: meaningful community involvement, cultural responsiveness, addressing structural barriers, building community capacity, and ensuring accountability to communities. This framework acknowledges that effective HIV programming cannot be imposed from outside but must emerge from partnerships with communities that bring lived experience, cultural knowledge, and existing trust relationships.

The focus on health equity represents both a goal and a strategy within the EHE initiative. The initiative recognizes that HIV disparities are not accidental but result from structural inequities including racism, homophobia, transphobia, poverty, and other forms of systematic oppression. Addressing these disparities requires not only expanding access to HIV services but also confronting the underlying social and economic conditions that create vulnerability to HIV.

This equity focus has led to targeted investments in organizations serving communities of color, LGBTQ+ communities, and other marginalized populations. It has also influenced the types of interventions supported, with increased emphasis on structural interventions such as housing support, transportation assistance, and economic empowerment programs that address social determinants of HIV vulnerability.

Integration with Broader Health and Social Systems

The EHE initiative operates within a broader ecosystem of health and social services, requiring coordination and integration across multiple systems and sectors. This includes integration with existing HIV programs such as the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program, coordination with broader public health initiatives, and alignment with social services that address determinants of health.

The relationship between EHE and the Ryan White Program illustrates both opportunities and challenges in system integration. Ryan White funding provides essential HIV care and support services that complement EHE prevention and early intervention efforts. However, the programs operate under different funding mechanisms, regulations, and reporting requirements, creating coordination challenges for local implementers.

Integration with substance abuse treatment, mental health services, and criminal justice systems represents another critical area for EHE implementation. Many people at risk for or living with HIV also interact with these systems, creating opportunities for coordinated interventions. However, these systems often operate independently, with different priorities, cultures, and approaches that can create barriers to integration.

The initiative has increasingly recognized the importance of addressing social determinants of health, including housing, employment, education, and food security. While EHE funding cannot directly address all these issues, the initiative has supported innovations such as housing support for people with HIV, transportation assistance for accessing care, and coordination with other social services that affect HIV outcomes.

Measuring Progress: Data and Evaluation

The EHE initiative places strong emphasis on data-driven decision making and continuous evaluation of progress toward goals. This includes surveillance systems that track HIV diagnoses, linkage to care, and viral suppression; monitoring systems that assess the implementation and reach of EHE-funded interventions; and evaluation studies that examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different approaches.

Surveillance data provide the foundation for assessing progress toward the initiative’s quantitative goals. Recent data suggest that the initiative has contributed to continued reductions in new HIV infections, with a 12% decrease in estimated HIV infections from 2018 to 2022. However, the rate of decline would need to accelerate significantly to achieve the 75% reduction by 2025, highlighting the challenges of achieving the initiative’s ambitious goals.

Process evaluation data reveal significant expansion of HIV services in EHE priority jurisdictions, including increased HIV testing, expanded PrEP access, and improved linkage to care rates. Three jurisdictions have already met the 2025 goal of linking 95% of newly diagnosed people to HIV care within one month, demonstrating that the initiative’s targets are achievable with sufficient resources and effective implementation.

However, evaluation also reveals persistent disparities in outcomes across different populations and geographic areas. While overall progress has been encouraging, communities of color, rural populations, and other marginalized groups continue to face disproportionate barriers to accessing EHE services and achieving optimal outcomes. This highlights the ongoing need for targeted, equity-focused interventions.

Innovation and Adaptation

The EHE initiative has served as a catalyst for innovation in HIV prevention and care, supporting the development and testing of new approaches, technologies, and service delivery models. These innovations span the entire spectrum from biomedical interventions to community engagement strategies.

Technological innovations supported through EHE include expanded use of telehealth for HIV care, mobile applications for PrEP adherence support, electronic health record integration for HIV screening, and data analytics tools for outbreak detection and response. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of many of these technologies, demonstrating their potential for improving access and efficiency of HIV services.

Service delivery innovations include integration of HIV services with primary care, community-based PrEP programs, peer navigation services, and mobile outreach programs. Many of these innovations focus on reducing barriers to accessing services by meeting people where they are, both geographically and in terms of their readiness for intervention.

Community engagement innovations include participatory approaches to program design, community advisory boards that provide ongoing input to EHE programs, and leadership development initiatives that build capacity within affected communities. These approaches recognize that sustainable change requires building local ownership and capacity rather than simply implementing externally designed interventions.

Looking Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities

As the EHE initiative approaches its midpoint goal of 2025, both achievements and challenges are becoming clear. The initiative has demonstrably expanded HIV prevention and care services, contributed to continued reductions in new infections, and catalyzed innovations that may have lasting impact beyond the initiative itself. However, the pace of progress suggests that achieving the 75% reduction by 2025 will require accelerated efforts and potentially new approaches.

The funding environment remains a critical factor in the initiative’s future success. While congressional support has been generally consistent, the gap between requested and appropriated funding continues to limit the initiative’s potential impact. Additionally, the initiative faces potential changes in political priorities that could affect future funding and policy support.

The workforce crisis in HIV and infectious disease medicine represents an increasingly urgent challenge that could undermine the initiative’s success regardless of funding levels. The proposed Bio-Preparedness Workforce Pilot Program offers a potential solution, but its implementation has faced political and funding obstacles. Without addressing workforce shortages, particularly in rural and underserved areas, the initiative’s service expansion goals may be unachievable.

Emerging challenges include the potential impact of long-acting HIV prevention and treatment technologies, which could transform the intervention landscape but require different implementation strategies. The initiative will need to adapt its approaches as these technologies become available while ensuring that innovations benefit all communities equitably.

The Philanthropic Partnership: Expanding Resources and Innovation

Recognizing that federal funding alone cannot achieve the ambitious goals of ending the HIV epidemic, the EHE initiative has increasingly emphasized partnerships with philanthropic organizations, private sector partners, and community-based funders. These partnerships bring additional resources, innovation capacity, and community connections that complement federal investments.

Funders Concerned About AIDS (FCAA) has played a crucial role in tracking and analyzing philanthropic investments in HIV, particularly those aligned with EHE goals. Their signature resource tracking report captures data on more than 5,000 grants awarded by 323 foundations across 10 countries, providing insights into funding trends, gaps, and opportunities. This analysis has been particularly valuable for identifying areas where philanthropic funding can fill gaps in federal support or support innovations that might later be scaled through public funding.

AIDSVu’s partnership with FCAA to include philanthropic funding data in EHE profiles provides unprecedented transparency about the total resource landscape available to priority jurisdictions. This information helps local implementers understand the full funding environment and identify opportunities for coordination and collaboration across different funding streams.

The analysis reveals interesting patterns in philanthropic HIV funding, including geographic concentrations that sometimes align with EHE priorities and sometimes identify different areas of need. Understanding these patterns helps both public and private funders make more strategic decisions about resource allocation and helps local organizations develop more comprehensive resource development strategies.

The Path Forward: Sustaining Progress Beyond 2030

While the EHE initiative sets specific goals for 2025 and 2030, ending the HIV epidemic will require sustained effort extending beyond these timeframes. The initiative’s long-term impact will depend not only on achieving its quantitative goals but also on building sustainable systems, capacity, and political commitment that can maintain progress over time.

System strengthening represents one of the most important long-term contributions of the EHE initiative. By investing in workforce development, data systems, community capacity, and service integration, the initiative is building infrastructure that can support ongoing HIV prevention and care efforts regardless of future funding levels or policy changes.

The initiative’s emphasis on community engagement and leadership development may prove to be its most enduring legacy. By building capacity within communities most affected by HIV, the initiative is creating the foundation for sustained advocacy, service delivery, and innovation that can continue regardless of external support.

Innovation and evidence generation through the EHE initiative provide knowledge and tools that extend far beyond the initiative itself. Successful interventions developed and tested through EHE can be adapted and implemented in other settings, while lessons learned about implementation challenges can inform future public health efforts.

The EHE initiative represents both a scientific opportunity and a moral imperative. It demonstrates that with sufficient political will, adequate resources, and comprehensive strategies, dramatic improvements in public health outcomes are possible. However, it also illustrates the challenges of addressing health problems rooted in structural inequities and social determinants that extend far beyond the health sector.

Success in ending the HIV epidemic will require not only the continuation and expansion of evidence-based interventions but also broader societal changes that address racism, homophobia, poverty, and other forms of systematic oppression that create vulnerability to HIV. The EHE initiative provides a framework and a catalyst for this broader work, but achieving its ultimate goals will require sustained commitment from all sectors of society.

As we move forward, the lessons learned from the EHE initiative—both its successes and its challenges—provide valuable insights for addressing other health disparities and public health challenges. The initiative demonstrates both the potential and the limitations of targeted, well-funded public health interventions, while highlighting the ongoing need for comprehensive approaches that address both immediate health needs and underlying structural determinants of health outcomes.

EHE Geographic Focus and Community Impact

AIDSVu provides comprehensive data and analysis of the EHE initiative’s geographic focus and community-level impact through detailed profiles of priority jurisdictions. These resources help users understand the local context, funding landscape, and program implementation across EHE-targeted areas.

Priority Jurisdiction Analysis: Of the 48 highest burden counties targeted by the initiative, 48% are located in the South, reflecting the ongoing concentration of HIV transmission in this region. Additionally, 63% of the 48 target counties and Washington D.C. have poverty rates higher than the national average, highlighting the intersection between economic disadvantage and HIV vulnerability.

PrEP Access Mapping: Most of the 48 target counties are located in states with high unmet need for PrEP, demonstrating the critical importance of expanding access to this highly effective prevention tool in EHE priority areas.

Philanthropic Funding Integration: AIDSVu’s partnership with Funders Concerned About AIDS (FCAA) provides unique insights into HIV-related philanthropic investments in EHE jurisdictions, offering a more complete picture of the total resource landscape available to support local HIV prevention and care efforts.

Check out AIDSVu’s EHE profiles to explore detailed data for each EHE county and state, including HIV epidemiology, social determinants of health, and funding information.

48%

Of the 48 highest burden counties targeted by the initiative, 48% are in the South.

63%

In 63% of the 48 target counties and DC, the percent of people living in poverty is higher than the national average.

48

Most of the 48 target counties fall in states with a high unmet need for PrEP.

View the Map

Explore AIDSVu’s state, county, and city profiles to learn more about the 48 cities, 7 states, and two cities targeted by the initiative.

Number of Persons Newly Diagnosed with HIV, 2023

5 Ways to Use AIDSVu

View Local Statistics

State-, county-, and city-level profiles for the 56 jurisdictions targeted by the initiative.

Learn More

Explore Maps

Interactive maps for the 57 jurisdictions, viewable with local service locations and social determinants of health.

Learn More

Share Infographics

Infographics on the national plan’s key strategies and other state and local jurisdictional plans to end the HIV epidemic.

Learn More

Expert Blogs

Stay up to date with the latest Q&As from experts on HIV.

Learn More

Locate Services

Use AIDSVu’s service locators to find HIV testing, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), and other HIV services near you

Learn More

Share our Infographics

Share our infographics to help raise awareness and drive conversations about the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.

Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Download
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn

Learn From Experts

Read our series of Q&A’s with leading experts to learn more about efforts to end the HIV epidemic.

August 29, 2023

Dr. Vincent Guilamo-Ramos on Progress Towards Ending the HIV Epidemic

Read More

August 29, 2023

Comentarios del Dr. Vincent Guilamo-Ramos sobre el progreso de la iniciativa Acabar con la Epidemia del VIH

Read More

April 14, 2020

Dr. Patrick Sullivan on PrEP Coverage and Application in the Ending the Epidemic: A Plan for America (EHE) Jurisdictions

Read More

August 14, 2019

Dr. Patrick Sullivan on Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America

Read More

December 4, 2018

The Washington State Department of Health on the End AIDS Washington Campaign

Read More

November 29, 2018

NASTAD on Ending the Epidemic Plans Across the U.S.

Read More

November 3, 2022

AIDS United on the Federal HIV Funding Landscape

Read More

November 3, 2022

Funders Concerned About AIDS on Philanthropic EHE Funding

Read More

February 7, 2020

Raniyah Copeland on the Black Plan to End HIV in America

Read More

For More Information

Learn more about EHE with these resources.

HIV.gov

Learn More

HRSA

Learn More

CDC

Learn More

NASTAD

Learn More

UNAIDS

Learn More
Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Sign up for AIDSVu updates.

Footer Form

Footer

HepVu HepVu

AIDSVu is presented by Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health in partnership with Gilead Sciences, Inc. and the Center for AIDS Research at Emory University (CFAR).

  • About
  • FAQ
  • Data Methods
  • Datasets
  • Citation

Questions?
Info@AIDSVu.org

Media Inquiries
(202) 854-0480
Media@AIDSVu.org

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

© 2025 AIDSVu. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Sign up for AIDSVu updates:

Sign up to stay informed on new data, maps, expert Q&As, and infographics about HIV where you live.

Popup Form